From standard of living to quality of living

How to read this

For two hundred years, life in Europe got better in ways you can count. People earned more, lived longer, worked fewer hours and lived in cleaner cities. That’s standard of living: what is actually there.

That’s one layer of three. The Quality of Life Study reads quality of life as:

  • Conditions

    what is there.

  • Experience

    how life feels to the people living it.

  • Ideal

    whether it’s the life they would choose.

Part one follows the first layer from 1820 to 2008. Part two looks at where we stand now. Part three looks at the next goal, and how we get there.

I read each period through four parts of life: living, work, health and contribution. Countries moved at different speeds, so each example shows the direction, not a date all of Europe shared.

Part one: Two centuries of standard of living

The timeline

Tap a period to see its four pillars.

    • Live Good – Factory towns grow faster than their drains. In 1842 Edwin Chadwick, a British civil servant, shows that people in the filthiest streets die youngest. In the hot summer of 1858 the Thames smells so bad that Parliament votes to build London’s sewers.
    • Work Good – By 1870 a factory worker puts in over 3,000 hours a year: 60 to 70 hours a week, nearly every week.
    • Feel Good – A baby born in Western Europe can expect to live to around 35.
    • Do Good – In 1867 Britain gives the vote to working men in the towns. Most people, and all women, still have no say.

What the long run shows

Four things stand out.

  • Life got better, unevenly but steadily. Working hours roughly halved. In Germany they fell from 3,284 a year in 1870 to 1,354 by 2017. Life expectancy more than doubled. Clean water, sewers, cleaner air, the vote and rights in law came with it.

  • Every gain was a choice. In 1914 the eight-hour day was dismissed as impossible. Five years later it was the first international labour agreement. France’s paid holiday came out of a strike, not a market. Someone set each goal, and others fought for it. That’s the point I make in the Business Hippie Way: what was chosen can be chosen differently.

  • The biggest changes came in jolts. Two wars and the fall of the Berlin Wall changed lives more in a few years than decades of slow progress. You can’t draw a straight line through this history.

  • Almost everything counted was about work and place. Hours, wages, sewers, housing, the vote: things employers and governments could deliver. A person’s own life showed up mainly as an age at death.

Where the line runs out

By the early 2000s, most of what this timeline tracks had been won, at least in Western Europe. The numbers kept going up. What they couldn’t show was the gap: the distance between the life people live and the life they would choose. Nobody had really asked how life felt, or what people wanted from it.

In 2003 Eurofound, the EU agency that studies living and working conditions, ran its first European Quality of Life Survey. In 28 countries it asked people how satisfied they were with their lives, not only how they lived. A small date on this timeline, and the first step into the second layer: experience.

Part two: Where we stand

The goal starts moving

Since 2009, the people who measure progress have been moving away from GDP: the total value of everything a country produces and sells. Slowly at first, then faster.

  1. Year: 2009Who: Three economists – Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fitoussi – in a report for the French governmentWhat changed: GDP can’t tell you how people are actually doing
  2. Year: 2011Who: The OECD, the Paris-based club of the world’s richer democracies, launches its Better Life IndexWhat changed: Housing, work, health and life satisfaction compared side by side
  3. Year: 2012Who: The first World Happiness Report, for the UNWhat changed: Countries ranked on how satisfied their people are with life
  4. Year: 2015Who: Wales passes its Well-being of Future Generations ActWhat changed: Public bodies must, by law, weigh the wellbeing of people now and later
  5. Year: 2019Who: EU ministers, under Finland’s presidency, adopt conclusions on the Economy of WellbeingWhat changed: People’s wellbeing put at the centre of EU policy, next to economic growth
  6. Year: 2026Who: The United Nations publishes Counting What CountsWhat changed: 31 measures for countries to report alongside GDP

The direction is clear. Each step moves from what people have to how their lives are going. In May 2026 the UN Secretary-General put it plainly: what GDP measures and what people value have drifted far apart.

What hasn’t changed is who decides. Every step is top-down. Experts choose what counts, then measure it.

What the pandemic showed

2020 put the old measures to the test. In most of Western Europe, incomes, homes and hospitals broadly held.

What gave way was how life felt. Mental health got worse, most of all among young people and those who lost their jobs. Loneliness became something governments made policy about. The things nobody measured turned out to be holding everything else up.

Part three: The next goal

The dot at the horizon

The dot at the horizon is progress measured by how well life works for people, judged by their own standard.

You won’t find it by drawing a line through the past. Look at what each period set as its goal instead. Surviving the city. Cleaning up. Getting through. Having more. Having choice. Then, since 2008, measuring how life feels, not only what it holds. The next goal follows: let each person say what counts.

Those are the three layers, in order: conditions, then experience, then the ideal. The study’s early answers already put it in one line: “Survival is solved. Living is not.”

GDP doesn’t disappear. As I put it in the Business Hippie Way, it’s a fine measure of activity and the wrong goal for a society. It goes back to being a gauge, not the destination.

How a goal changes

Goals don’t change by themselves. Over two centuries, every shift took the same four steps. The next one is on the same path.

  1. 1. Seen

    Then 1842: Chadwick shows that filthy streets kill

    Now Almost everyone feels the gap between the life they live and the life they’d choose

  2. 2. Counted

    Then Deaths, working hours and who could vote get recorded

    Now The Quality of Life Study asks people how life feels and what they’d choose

  3. 3. Demanded

    Then Strikes for the eight-hour day, marches for the vote

    Now People, organisations and cities name their own goal

  4. 4. Made normal

    Then Laws, then habits nobody questions

    Now Quality of life reported next to GDP

Right now we’re between counted and demanded. The demand is the step nobody can take for you.

Safe is the last era’s goal

Most of us sense the old goal no longer fits. We follow it anyway. It feels safe, and the system rewards it.

But look at the timeline. Every goal on it was once the risky choice. The eight-hour day was a radical demand. So was the vote. So was asking how life feels rather than what it earns.

Playing safe isn’t neutral. It means chasing a goal someone else set, for a time that’s already gone.

A joint goal, and mine

The dot at the horizon isn’t mine to set for everyone. Each person, organisation and city sets its own ideal first, then sees where it stands.

The dot only becomes real when each of them names one:

  • A person – what would make my life better to live, and by when?
  • An organisation – how will we know our people are actually doing well?
  • A city – what will we count next to GDP?

The shared language is the 17 Living Goals: seventeen parts of a good life, such as time to truly live, and work that supports life rather than drains it. The UN asks experts what counts. The next step is asking people – what counts for them first, then where it stands.

I’ll go first. A goal you can’t check isn’t a goal, so here is mine:

  1. Next: one city publishes how its residents rate their lives on the 17 Living Goals, alongside its own statistics.
  2. By 2030: one city reports on the 17 Living Goals next to its GDP.

That’s ambitious for a one-person practice. It’s meant to be.

The next goal

Two centuries got us the conditions. The next stretch is about whether life actually works for the people living it.

So, which dot at the horizon are you aiming for?

In short

Question the goal. Redefine progress. Make different decisions.

  • Step 2

    Be counted

    Join the Quality of Life Study. 10 minutes, free.

    Join the study
  • Step 3

    The deal you would sign

    What a good life asks for, and what you’re willing to put in.

    Sign the manifesto

Sources